|
 |
Web design and development by:
Partners Include:
 |
Midway
Strategy Group
Market Leadership Strategies
Data-Driven Customer-Focused |
Web Master:
|
|
 |
China's trade liberalization policy has
led to extraordinary economic growth
But where will such growth lead China?
Trade liberalization introduced
by the late Chairman Deng Xiaoping in 1978 brought about extraordinary
economic growth in China. Since then, the average nine percent annual
growth rate in the Chinese Mainland has helped the country’s per capita
income grow from 1978’s RMB 379 (US $168) to 2004’s
RMB 10,500 (US $1,276), a whopping 2670% increase. Recognizing that
productivity is the determining factor in the economic development of
societies, China seeks, by 2020, through productivity development, to build
a society of largely middle-class families with a per capita income of RMB
25,000 (>US $3,000) for its 1.6 billion population.
Why
2020? Although China expects the high growth rate to last for at least 40 years,
it also recognizes that the country needs to maintain stability for several
decades to achieve such an elevated rate — clearly, a challenging and daunting task.
What factors will influence the course of this development? While
myriad factors will undoubtedly play a role, the following analysis is
based on
impressions I gleaned in the course of my participation at the International Forum on Productivity Development
in China, held in Beijing on November 17- 18, 2005. At the conference, 32 government
officials, academicians, and representatives of non-governmental
organizations, among them two Americans and one Briton active in the World
Academy of Productivity Science, reported the results of research designed
to help China cope with the problem of ensuring continued but stable growth and
development.
Moving Up the Value Chain
The
traditional manufacturing industries consume extensive amounts of natural
resources and energy. In response to this, China is determined to use
technology — “self-developed technology” — to optimize its productivity.
But manufacturing activities have not produced high income for China, a fact
that has made it increasingly urgent for China to develop its service
industry. According to the former Vice President of the China
Academy of Machinery Science and Technology, Qu Xianming, China must learn from such
companies as GE and IBM. Both companies sell products and services,
but both
derive greater revenues from sales of their services than from sales of
their products.
Currently, the primary industry sector in the Chinese Mainland accounts for
less than 40% of China’s overall economy while the secondary industry sector
has grown fivefold since the liberalization, accounting for
about 30% percent of the economy. In 2004, the service industry sector accounted for 31.9%
of China’s GDP. Developing China’s tertiary industry sector in high-tech and
services will help alleviate the conflict between supply and demand of
capital and resources as well as provide more employment opportunities for
the population; it is an important component of any development plan.
Toward Achieving
the
2020 Plan
By
the end of 2005, China’s rural population accounted for 57% of its total
population.
To
build a society of
largely
middle-class families by 2020 through productivity development, China is
increasingly turning toward urbanization, which is currently at 45%, a 50%
increase since 1978. Urbanization — building infrastructure, expanding
transportation structure, improving industrial production, and encouraging
consumer spending —
makes China a bigger and more concentrated consumer market. But urbanization
can exert negative impacts, too. These include human resource shortages, low productivity, resource
depletion, environmental costs, and reduced consumption power among the
rural population.
One positive though clearly partial response to these
critical issues resides in so-called green productivity — that is, change
wrought through top-down and bottom-up cooperation between the government
and enterprises. Indeed, the Chinese government is working to effect
change in many areas.
To
effect total change and to realize its 2020 goals, China must obtain the support and cooperation of its
population as well as of the rest of the world.
Sectoring China into Developmental Regions
One
focal point of Forum participants is on the importance of developing
China’s various regions, especially, developing connectivity within the
regions, which would link them together, aiding them in building and
expanding infrastructure and transportation structure. Following the
successes of the Pearl River Delta and the Yangtze River Delta regions, the
Bohai Bay region has emerged as the center of the next phase of development.
Other regions targeted for priority development include China’s West and
Northeast regions. As these projects illustrate, China can make use of its
geography in developing bi-lateral and regional trading and cooperation
blocs. Indeed, three provinces in the Northeast — Jilin, Liaoning and
Heilongjiang — serve as links to Russia, Korea and Japan; while Yunnan is a
connecting point to Southeast Asia and South Asia; and, Guangxi, a part of
the Pan-Pearl River Delta (PAN-PRD) region, is a corridor to ASEAN
countries, particularly to Vietnam, Malaysia, and Thailand.
Highlighting the importance of the development of China’s provincial
economies, Forum participants sought, first, to identify the latter’s
strengths and weaknesses and, then, to develop plans for channeling China’s
provincial development into regional trade and cooperation. Participants
also maintained that transforming the regions from rural to urban would
minimize migration as well as other social and cultural concerns. Moreover,
by creating super-cities, China can take advantage of economies of scale:
return on investment will be higher and, among other things, it will be
easier to implement environmental protections.
Ensuring Energy and Natural Resource Security
Forum discussion stressed two main points regarding energy: first, China
has long depended on domestic sources for its energy supply. Second, energy
security is an issue directly related to national security. Petroleum, in
contrast to other fuels, is a critical strategic material for military and
national defense, and, therefore, its security is the most significant energy-related
security issue confronting a country.
From 1997 to 2002, China’s energy self-sufficiency rate was high. However,
since 2002, due to rapid economic development, the demand for energy has
risen sharply. Besides giving priority to coal usage and supporting a policy
of self-reliance, Forum participants asserted that the country’s net
petroleum import rate should never be higher than 20%, and, for petroleum
security, China should limit its net import rate to below 30%. Though China
has an extensive supply of resources, ranking third in the world, its per
capita resources are low. Its exploration for, and exploitation of, resources is inefficient and poorly
managed. Because the discrepancy between resource
supply and demand over the next 30 years is predicted to be significant, it
is important to protect the supply, i.e., control exploitation and also promote renewable energy use.
A number of participants, including Wang Mengkui, President of the Development Research Center
of the State Council, asserted that China's rapid growth had exacted a very
high price: the excessive use of its resources. The Chinese must recognize that
energy saving is not only a task for the government but needs the support of
everyone as it is going to affect the entire Chinese population and its
livelihood.
Practicing Environmental Protection
China is experiencing the loss of land as a result of environmental issues,
a situation that
clearly harms the economy. Specifically, the country needs to improve the
quality of its drinking water; upgrade its drainage system; restrict
townships to limit soil erosion and avoid water and lake pollution; provide for treatment of land deterioration, preserve grassland, and reclaim
arable land. Over the next 15 years, more than 600 cities in China will
need to improve their environments. Indeed, within the next few years, China
is expected to start a pilot program designed to deal with environmental
issues in the 113 cities the government has termed “atmospheric pollution
control cities.”
Based on the recommendations of the China Environmental Protection
Foundation, China should incorporate three major principles in its environmental
control policies: (1) Those who have caused pollution should be responsible for
cleaning it up (2) environmental protection and management procedures must
be improved and (3)
the rule of law in the area of environmental protection should be
strengthened . Obviously, China's future well-being depends on the
adoption of these key principles.
Promoting Education and Independence
If
education is the key to improving China’s productivity, then training is the
means to upgrade its labor force. And where does technology fit into all
this? Clearly, technology is related to national security. While China’s
technological capabilities are abundant, it is lacking in organization and
innovation skills. It needs management talent to lead its companies — on the
Mainland
as well as abroad – but demand for that talent far exceeds supply. Between
1995 and 2005, China’s export structure experienced drastic changes: while
labor-intensive exports declined from their number one position, high-tech
exports became increasingly important. However, as of 2004, 57.1% of China’s
exports were goods from foreign-invested companies; and the technology was
largely foreign-owned.
Indeed, there is not enough R&D activity in China. Though big companies
generally make larger R&D expenditures, this is not true for the entire
economy. In the past 15 years, large- and medium-sized Chinese enterprises
maintained an R&D budget of around 0.75%. It is only in recent years that
China has begun to develop its own intellectual property and to apply for
patents. To achieve national independence in technological innovation,
China must organize and develop its own technology, cooperate with foreign
partners, and make technology acquisitions. Moreover, it must maintain its
determination to develop its legal structure, especially an aggressive
pursuit of intellectual property rights protection. This should facilitate
trade and business and enable China to honor both its World Trade
Organization obligations and its intellectual property development needs.
Improving the Social and Financial Structure
Beyond promoting economic development and productivity, China must ensure
that social security remains in place in order to safeguard societal
stability. In its quest to build a society of middle-class families, it must address three major issues: uneven income distribution, unemployment,
and an aging population. Besides providing basic insurance to the
population, China needs to improve medical policy as well as to introduce
commercial insurance.
On
the financial front, a basic financial framework has been established in
China. However, there are some aspects of the system that are inconsistent
with free market development, including the unfulfilled transformation of
fiscal function, an imperfect tax-sharing system, and an incomplete taxation
system. To build a strong foundation for productivity development and
maintain financial security, China must establish a public financial system,
comprehensive risk management, and financial control procedures and
structures.
On
the food supply front, China has adopted a so-called policy of food safety:
that is, to assure China is fed, it supports a position in which supply and
demand are basically balanced. Gao Tiesheng, a former Director of the State
Bureau of Grain Reserve, asserted that issues concerning grain and
food have a vital bearing on the lifeline of the national economy and state
security. To ensure food security, Gao recommends making the best use of
both international and domestic grain markets — the physical market as well
as the futures market.
Expanding the Chinese Economy by Going Abroad
To
expand the Chinese economy, the Central Government is encouraging Chinese
enterprises to build two economies: one in China and the other abroad to
connect with the world and to optimize productivity and utilization of world resources.
Since China lacks the types of multinational organizations found in a number of
other countries and has no experience in mergers and acquisitions (M&A),
its companies require substantial assistance if they are to establish a
presence abroad. To
swiftly secure a position in the world market and to improve its trade position.,
which is China's goal, Chinese companies will have to actively engage in investment and M&A activities overseas as
well as to establish its own multinationals.
Cooperation with the Rest of the World
Globalization brings the world together, making members of the global
community more dependent on one another, for better or for worse. China’s
optimization of productivity affects the rest of the world as well as
China.
Indeed, Forum participants were keenly aware of the dangers non-cooperation
presents. As emphasized by George Smith, Forum participant and President of
the World Academy of Productivity Science, “War anywhere in the world will
interrupt the supply chain; so no one can tolerate a war, or terrorism.”
This sentiment was echoed by many other
Forum participants.
Final
Thoughts
China is reaching out to its neighbors and partners guided by the central
government’s diplomatic policy of mutual cooperation. Heard
frequently among Forum participants are the two basic tenets of this policy:
Treat your neighbors well and as partners; and make your neighbors
harmonious, wealthy, and safe.
Foreign investment helped China in its economic development over the last 25
years. Now the Middle Kingdom is going abroad to build its second economy.
This will benefit China as well as the rest of the world though it remains
unclear which countries or
regions will benefit most from the development taking shape in
China.
I
believe it will spur a major global competition among a number of countries
in the world. Don't you?
Anita Tang
is managing director of Royal Roots Global Inc., a management and investment
consultancy she founded in 1994.
Headquartered in Chicago, the firm has a liaison office in Washington D.C. and
associates in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Beijing. Anita has eight
years of experience working in Treasury in four major European banks. In 1989, she started a trading and
investment firm in Singapore, after which she established Royal Roots in
Chicago. A frequent speaker in Illinois’s and China’s business and academic
communities, she holds an MBA from the Kellogg School of Management,
Northwestern University.
|